ABOUT

Portrait of Akiko Mega, founder of Faro.

Akiko Mega

Akiko Mega founded Faro, the advisory practice of The Mega Center, to work at exactly that intersection: strategy and human capacity, at the moment when organizational readiness determines whether the business performs. Her operating background is what distinguishes Faro from every other leadership advisory in the market. Before building the practice, she ran businesses. As Co-Country Manager at Maison Margiela — operating inside a Mitsubishi Corporation joint venture — she drove the organizational and commercial growth that preceded the house's acquisition by OTB Group. That role required navigating one of the most structurally complex organizational environments in Japanese business: a European luxury house, a Japanese conglomerate partner, and a Western parent organization, simultaneously. She was accountable for the number and for the people carrying it. She learned what gets lost between the regional office and the room where decisions get made — and how to close that distance. That same instinct found an early form at Nippon Partners, a Japan-focused value investment fund co-managed by Jim Grant of Grant's Interest Rate Observer, where she was brought in to access what balance sheets and P&L data don't reach — the operational and organizational interior of a business, read from the inside: both as an operator and someone who straddled local operations and global capital. This is not organizational advisory delivered by someone who has studied how businesses work. It is built by someone who ran them. Faro works with two kinds of organizations. The first is growing faster than its leaders were built to carry. Individual contributors became managers before they were ready to lead. The company that existed twelve months ago is unrecognizable. The strategy is right. The infrastructure isn't there yet. Faro's work in this context is capacity — building the leadership architecture the business needs before the gap between demand and capability compounds into something harder to fix. The second is large, established, and not moving fast enough. The intelligence exists — in the market, in the region, in the leader who has watched the opportunity form for two years. But the signal dies somewhere between their desk and the global conversation that could act on it. The Country Manager in Tokyo sees what needs to happen. The message doesn't travel. Faro's work here is transmission: helping leaders become legible to the rooms above them without losing the authority that makes them right about the market in the first place. Both conditions have the same root: the leader cannot fully carry what the organization needs them to carry. In one case the problem is capacity. In the other it is range. The work is organizational readiness — not leadership development as a service, but leadership infrastructure as a business requirement. People leaders engage Faro because what closes this gap is not cultural awareness training. It is operating credibility, contextual depth, and the experience of having run the business you are now advising on. Business owners find Faro — or their People leaders do, and look smart for it. The methodology Akiko has developed is called Sentient Leadership — the practice of operating from the human register underneath the strategy, where empathy becomes contact and culture becomes a design choice rather than a symptom. It is the intellectual foundation of Faro's work and the subject of her ongoing research and writing.

Selected Clients: Microsoft · Figma · IDEO · Tekoma Energy· Barclays · Kyriba

Raised in Texas. Imprinted in New York and Paris. Built in Tokyo. Trilingual: English, Japanese, French. Board Member, Hokkaido International School. Based in Japan, with engagements across Asia and at global headquarters.

From Practice:Thinking that lives outside the engagement room

Someone Carries That‍ ‍

There Is No Love Without Presence

Current research:The Adaptive Tax — the invisible, uncompensated cost leaders absorb when operating across cultural systems. Framed not as a fairness issue but as a pipeline problem, a performance drag, and a deceleration mechanism for organizations that cannot afford one.

LinkedIn